Programs Of Lasers In Dentistry: A Review

Programs of Lasers in Dentistry: A Review

Author:

Prof (Dr.) Bashir A Mir

Professor,

Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical treatment,

Govt. Dental Faculty, Sgr.

Co authors:

Dr. Ajaz A Shah

Associate Professor and Head,

Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical treatment,

Govt. Dental Faculty, Sgr.

Dr. Suhail Latoo

Lecturer

Division of Oral Pathology and Microbiology,

Govt. Dental Faculty, Sgr

Dr. Altaf H Malik

Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical treatment,

Govt. Dental Faculty, Sgr

Summary

 Lasers ended up released into the field of clinical dentistry with the hope of conquering some of the downsides posed by the common strategies of dental processes. Since its initially experiment for dental application in the nineteen sixties, the use of laser has enhanced promptly in the past few of decades. At present, large types of processes are carried out applying lasers. The intention of this assessment is to explain the application of lasers in dental difficult tissue processes. Lasers are uncovered to be efficient in cavity planning, caries removing, restoration removing, etching, and treatment of dentinal sensitivity, caries prevention and bleaching. Based on improvement in adhesive dentistry and the propagation of minimal intervention concepts, lasers might revolutionize cavity style and planning. 

 Critical text: laser, dental difficult tissue, adhesive dentistry

INTRODUCTION

The use of lasers in dentistry has enhanced over the earlier handful of decades. The initially laser was released into the fields of medicine and dentistry all through the nineteen sixties (Goldman et al., 1964). Since then, this science has progressed promptly. Simply because of their a lot of advantages, lasers are indicated for a large variety of processes (Frentzen and Koort, 1990 Aoki et al., 1994 Pelagalli et al., 1997 Walsh, 2003). Traditional strategies of cavity planning with low- and superior-velocity handpieces entail sound, unpleasant vibrations and worry for individuals. Although ache might be diminished by neighborhood anaesthesia, anxiety of the needle and of sound and vibration of mechanical planning remains results in of irritation. These shortcomings have led to a research for new procedures as potential alternate options for dental difficult tissue removing. The intention of this assessment is to explain the application of lasers in dental difficult tissue processes. 

Historic improvement

The initially experiment with lasers in dentistry was claimed in a study about the effects of a pulsed ruby laser on human caries (Goldman et al, 1964). The effects of that study confirmed that the effects varied from smaller 2-mm deep holes to full disappearance of the carious tissue, with some whitening of the bordering rim of enamel, indicating intensive destruction of carious parts alongside with crater development and melting of dentine. Additional function in the 1970’s targeted on the effects of neodymium (Nd) and carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers on dental difficult tissues. Early researches uncovered that CO2 lasers developed cracking and disruption of enamel rods, incineration of dentinal tubule contents, too much decline of tooth construction, carbonisation and fissuring and enhanced mineralization induced by the removing of natural and organic contents (Gimbel, 2000). It was also claimed that the use of the CO2 laser was unfavourable since of the decline of the odontoblastic layer (Wigdor et al., 1993).

As a result, it was concluded that, unless of course heat-linked structural modifications and problems to dentinal tissues could be diminished, laser technological innovation could not substitute the common dental drill. Additional advances in laser technological innovation however, have determined acceptable biologic interactions. For example, the Er: YAG laser was examined for its potential to ablate (or vapourise) dental difficult tissues (Gimbel, 2000). Enamel and dentine cavities ended up correctly well prepared applying the Er: YAG laser. Since then, this laser has been made use of for caries removing and cavity planning, tender tissue slight surgical treatment and scaling (Aoki and Watanabe et al., 1998).

Scientific Programs

Cavity planning

The Er: YAG laser was examined for getting ready dental difficult tissues for the initially time in 1988. It was correctly made use of to prepare holes in enamel and dentine with low ‘fluences’ (electrical power (mJ)/device location (cm2)). Even with out drinking water-cooling (Burkes et al., 1992), the well prepared cavities confirmed no cracks and low or no charring even though the signify temperature increase of the pulp cavity was about 4.3°C (Rechmann et al., 1998). In 1989, it was demonstrated that the Er: YAG laser developed cavities in enamel and dentine with out important adverse facet effects. The ablation efficiency was about one particular purchase of magnitude lower than for tender tissue. It was then concluded that dentine and enamel removing was really efficient with no threat to the pulp (Armengol, 2000 Cavalcanti, 2003) and the ablation prices in enamel ended up mentioned to be in the array of 20-50 µm/pulse, and in dentine they ended up claimed to be as superior at lower fluences.

Clinically, cavity planning in enamel effects in ablation craters with a white chalky visual appeal on the surface area of the crater (Tokonabe et al., 1999). In dentine, cavity margins are sharp and dentinal tubules remain open up with out a smear layer. In a clinical study done to examine the efficiency and protection of the Er: YAG laser for caries removing and cavity planning in dentine and enamel (Cozean et al, 1997), Class I, II, III, IV and V cavities ended up well prepared for amalgam and composite restorations. It was uncovered that the Er: YAG laser was equivalent to the air rotor in its potential to make cavity preparations in enamel and dentine and take away caries. However, the ground of the planning was not as smooth as that obtained with the superior-velocity drill.  

Caries removing

Carious material contains a larger drinking water articles as opposed with bordering wholesome dental difficult tissues. As a result, the ablation efficiency of caries is better than for wholesome tissues. There is a doable selectivity in the removing of carious material applying the Er: YAG laser since of the different electrical power prerequisite to ablate carious and audio tissues leaving all those wholesome tissues minimally affected. However, Rechmann et al. (1998) uncovered that selective ablation of carious dentine is complicated with the Er: YAG laser. The ablation thresholds of wholesome dentine and carious dentine are different. The ablation threshold of wholesome dentine is two occasions larger than the corresponding threshold of carious dentine.

As a result, really smaller fluences (electrical power (Joules) / location (cm2)) of the Er: YAG laser electrical power are demanded to selectively ablate carious dentine. This low fluence will final result in low efficiency of the ablation method (Shigetani, 2002). In an additional in vitro study investigating the effectiveness of caries removing by Er: YAG laser, it was uncovered that the Er: YAG laser ablated carious dentine successfully with small thermal problems to the bordering intact dentine (Aoki and Ishikawa et al., 1998). The laser eradicated infected and softened carious dentine to the exact same degree as the bur treatment. In addition, a lower degree of vibration was pointed out with the Er: YAG laser treatment. However, the study did not handle the difficulty of selective removing of carious tissue and additional research of caries removing applying lasers are indicated. 

Restoration removing

The Er: YAG laser is capable of taking away cement, composite resin and glass ionomer (Dostalova et al., 1998 Gimbel, 2000). The efficiency of ablation is similar to that of enamel and dentine. Lasers should really not be made use of to ablate amalgam restorations however, since of potential release of mercury vapour. The Er: YAG laser is incapable of taking away gold crowns, forged restorations and ceramic materials since of the low absorption of these materials and reflection of the laser gentle (Keller et al., 1998). These restrictions emphasize the want for satisfactory operator schooling in the use of lasers.

Etching

Laser etching has been evaluated as an alternate to acid etching of enamel and dentine. The Er: YAG laser provides micro-explosions all through difficult tissue ablation that final result in microscopic and macroscopic irregularities. These micro-irregularities make the enamel surface area micro-retentive and might supply a system of adhesion with out acid-etching. However, it has been demonstrated that adhesion to dental difficult tissues right after Er: YAG laser etching is inferior to that obtained right after common acid etching (Martinez-Insua et al., 2000). These authors attributed the weaker bond toughness of the composite to laser-etched enamel and dentine to the presence of subsurface fissuring right after laser radiation. This fissuring is not observed in common etched surfaces. The subsurface fissuring contributed to the superior prevalence of cohesive tooth fractures in bonding of the two laser-etched enamel and dentine.

A similar conclusion was drawn from a study that as opposed shear bond toughness (SBS) of composite resin to dentine surfaces adhering to different treatment options (Ceballos et al., 2001). These authors claimed that acid etched specimens obtained the highest SBS values, even though laser treatment confirmed the least expensive SBS effects. These results propose that intensive fissuring induced by laser treatment and the consequent very poor bonding toughness might outweigh the putative advantages of laser etching.

Treatment method of dentinal hypersensitivity

Dentinal hypersensitivity is one particular of the most frequent problems in dental clinical exercise. A variety of treatment modalities these as the application of concentrated fluoride to seal the uncovered dentinal tubules have been examined to handle the affliction. However, the accomplishment charge can be significantly enhanced by the ongoing analysis of lasers in difficult tissue apps. A comparison of the desensitising effects of an Er: YAG laser with all those of a common desensitising procedure on cervically uncovered hypersensitive dentine (Schwarz et al., 2002) confirmed that desensitising of hypersensitive dentine with an Er: YAG laser is efficient, and the servicing of a positive final result is extra prolonged than with other brokers.

Caries prevention

Various research examined the probability of applying laser to stop caries (Hossain et al., 2000 Apel et al., 2003). It is considered that laser irradiation of dental difficult tissues modifies the calcium to phosphate ratio, minimizes the carbonate to phosphorous ratio, and potential customers to the development of extra steady and significantly less acid soluble compounds, decreasing susceptibility to acid attack and caries. Laboratory research have indicated that enamel surfaces uncovered to laser irradiation are extra acid resistant than non-laser addressed surfaces (Watanabe et al., 2001 Arimoto et al., 2001).

The degree of safety against caries progression supplied by the one particular-time preliminary laser treatment was claimed to be similar to everyday fluoride treatment by a fluoride dentifrice (Featherstone, 2000). The threshold pH for enamel dissolution was reportedly decreased from 5.5 to 4.eight and the difficult tooth construction was 4 occasions extra resistance to acid dissolution. However, the real system of acid resistance by laser irradiation is however unclear and research, notably in vivo, to examination all those statements are demanded.

Bleaching

The goal of laser bleaching is to attain an efficient power bleaching method applying the most effective electrical power source, even though steering clear of any adverse effects (Sun, 2000). Electrical power bleaching has its origin in the use of superior-intensity gentle to increase the temperature of hydrogen peroxide, accelerating the chemical method of bleaching. The Food and drug administration authorized specifications for tooth whitening has cleared three dental laser wavelengths: argon, CO2 and the most recent 980-nm GaAIAs diode. There are no stories at present about the use of the Er: YAG laser in bleaching procedures. The wavelength of the Er: YAG laser might be unsuitable for the processes, but it is a additional location that could be explored.

Summary

The Er: YAG laser has been uncovered to have apps in parts these as cavity planning, removing of caries and restorations, and etching of enamel. However, the advantages as properly as restrictions of the Er: YAG laser treatment options have not however been fully documented. There seem to be home windows of chance for the Er: YAG laser in a array of dental apps. Lasers might revolutionise cavity style and planning primarily based on improvement in adhesive dentistry. 

REFERENCES

Aoki A, Ando Y, Watanabe H and Ishikawa I (1994). In vitro research on laser scaling of sub-gingival calculus with an erbium: YAG laser. J Periodontal, sixty five: 1097 – 1106

Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y and Yamamoto H (1998). Comparison in between Er: YAG laser and common strategy for root caries treatment in nitro. J Dent Res, six: 1404-1414.

Aoki A, Watanabe H and Ishikawa I (1998). Er: YAG clinical experience in Japan: assessment of scientific investigations. SPIE, 3248: forty-45.

Apel C, Schafer C and Gutknecht N (2003). Demineralization of Er: YAG and Er,Cr: YSGG Laser-Geared up Enamel Cavities in vitro. Caries Res, 37: 34-37.

Arimoto N, Suzaki A, Katada H and Senda A (2001). Acid Resistance in Lased Dentine. sixth International Congress on Lasers in Dentistry, sixty one-sixty two.

Armengol V, Jean A and Marion D (2000). Temperature increase all through Er: YAG and Nd: YAP laser ablation of dentine. J Endodon, 26(3): 138 –

141.

Burkes EJ, Hoke J, Gomes E and Wolbarsht M (1992). Moist compared to dry enamel ablation by Er: YAG laser. J Prosthet Dent, sixty seven: 847-851.

Cavalcanti BN, Lage-Marques JL and Rode SM (2003). Pulpal temperature raises with Er: YAG laser and superior-velocity handpieces. J Prosthet Dent, 90: 447-451.

Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M and Marshall GW (2001). Microleakage of composite restorations right after acid or Er: YAG laser cavity treatment. Dental Elements, 17: 340-346.

Cozean C, Arcoria CJ, Pelagalli J and Powell GL (1997). Dentistry for the 21st century? Erbium: YAG laser for tooth. J Am Dent Assoc, 128: 10801087.

Dostalova T, Jelinkova H, Kucerova H, Krejsa O, Hamal K, Kubelka J and Prochazka S (1998). Noncontact Er: YAG Laser Ablation: Scientific Evaluation. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 16(5): 273

Featherstone JDB (2000). Caries detection and prevention with laser electrical power. Dental Clinics of North The us, forty four(4): 955-969.

Frentzen M and Koort HJ (1990). Lasers in dentistry: new options with advancing laser technological innovation? Int Dent J, forty: 323 – 332

Gimbel CB (2000). Tricky tissue laser processes. Dental Clinics of North The us, forty four(4): 931-953.

Goldman L, Hornby P, Meyer R and Goldman B (1964). Affect of the laser on dental caries. Character, 203: 417.

Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Kimura Y, Yamada Y, Ito M and Matsumoto K (2000). Caries-Preventive Effect of Er: YAG Laser Irradiation with or with out Water Mist. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 18(2): sixty one-sixty five.

Keller U, Hibst R, Geurtsen W, Schilke R, Heidemann D, Klaiber B and Raab WHM (1998). Erbium: YAG laser application in caries treatment. Evaluation of affected individual notion and acceptance. J Dent, 26: 649-656.

Martinez-Insua            A, Dominguez LS, Rivera FG and Santana-Penin UA (2000). Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er: YAG – laser – addressed enamel and dentine surfaces. J Prosthet Dent, eighty four: 280-288.

Pelagalli J, Gimbel CB, Hansen RT, Swett A and Winn II DW (1997). Investigational Study of the Use of Er: YAG Laser Vs . Dental Drill for Caries Removal and Cavity Preparing – Phase I. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 15(3): 109 – 115.

Rechmann P, Goldin DS and Hennig T (1998). Er: YAG lasers in dentistry: an overview. SPIE, 3248: 0277-0286.

Schwarz F, Arweiler N, Georg T and Reich E (2002). Desensitising effects of an Er: YAG laser on hypersensitive dentine, a managed, future clinical study. J Clin Periodontol, 29: 211-215.

Shigetani Y, Okamoto A, Abu-Bakr N and Iwaku M (2002. A study of cavity planning by Er: YAG laser – observation of difficult tooth construction by laser scanning microscope and evaluation of the time needed to take away caries. Dent Mater J, 21(one): 20 – 31.

Sun G (2000). The role of lasers in cosmetic dentistry. Dental Clinics of North The us, forty four(4): 831-850.

Tokonabe H, Kouji R, Watanabe H, Nakamura Y and Matsumoto K (1999). Morphological modifications of human tooth with Er: YAG laser irradiation. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 17(one): 7-12.

Watanabe H, Yamamoto H, Kawamura M, Okagamv Y, Kataoka K and Ishikawa I (2001). Acid Resistance of the Human Teeth Enamel Irradiated by Er: YAG Laser. sixth International Congress on Lasers in Dentistry, sixty eight-sixty nine.

Walsh LJ (2003). The present-day standing of laser apps in dentistry. Aust Dent J, 48(3): 146

Wigdor H, Abt E, Ashrafi S and Walsh Jr JT (1993). The outcome of lasers on dental difficult tissues. J Am Dent Assoc, 124: sixty five-70. 

  • Partner links